Day Seventysix
This is my routine for June
1) Buy milk/newspaper/vegetables
2) Coffee
3) Write
4) Breakfast
5) Read / Online learning
6) Walk / Listen to podcast
7) Meditate
8) Cook lunch
9) Timed nap
10) Read / Online learning
11) Walk / Listen to podcast
11) Meditate
12) Dinner
13) Watch TV
14) Write Journal
Fillers - Sudoku / Music / Birdwatching / Mopping
1) Buy milk/newspaper/vegetables
2) Coffee
3) Write
4) Breakfast
5) Read / Online learning
6) Walk / Listen to podcast
7) Meditate
8) Cook lunch
9) Timed nap
10) Read / Online learning
11) Walk / Listen to podcast
11) Meditate
12) Dinner
13) Watch TV
14) Write Journal
Fillers - Sudoku / Music / Birdwatching / Mopping
Lancet has retracted the article critical of Hydroxychloroquine. It has been done at the request of three of its authors who “can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources”. The paper had halted trials of Hydroxychloroquine. It is being termed as one of the biggest retractions in modern history. It casts a long shadow on the hallowed practice of peer review. Peer review often takes several months. The announcement of Helium Hydride was held up for years! The rush to publish and cut short peer review is understandable in this pandemic, because it can be a matter of life and death. But it also gives science a bad name. What is the solution?
Comments
Post a Comment